How To Check Entry Ban in Turkey?

It is of critical importance for a foreigner to find out whether there is an entry ban against them regarding Turkey, on what grounds this ban is based if it exists, and its duration, in order to prevent hard-to-compensate damages in the future. These bans, which are recorded in electronic systems by the competent authorities and applied instantly at border gates, ensure the monitoring of the person’s legal status and compliance with national legislation. The methods that foreigners can use to access this information vary depending on their location (whether they are inside or outside Turkey) and whether they use a legal representative.

How to Learn the Entry Ban to Turkey? What are the Inquiry Methods?

How to Apply to Official Authorities and Examine the File Through a Lawyer?

Applications to be made to official authorities by the person subject to a ban decision or through a lawyer appointed as a representative are the healthiest, most transparent, and risk-free method to learn the nature of the restriction. A representative specializing in foreigners’ law can request an official file review before the Provincial Directorates of Migration Management.

The main purpose of the inquiry made with this method is not merely to learn the existence of the ban; it is to clarify the specific restriction code (e.g., Ç, G, N, or V codes) constituting the legal basis of the ban, the start and end dates of the ban, the amount of the administrative fine to be paid arising from visa violation, and whether the administrative decision was duly notified. This is because knowing the grounds of the ban forms the basis of the litigation strategy in annulment lawsuits to be filed in administrative courts or administrative applications to be made. Otherwise, legal steps to be taken without this information may lead to time barring or decisions of lack of jurisdiction.

Is it Possible to Determine the Status from Consulates and Embassies Abroad?

One of the most common and functional methods to learn about an entry ban for foreigners abroad is to apply for a visa through the Consulates or Embassies of the Republic of Turkey in their country of residence or to directly submit a request for information. Any visa application made to the consulates is examined through the fully integrated databases of the Ministry of Foreign Affairs and the Presidency of Migration Management of the Ministry of Interior.

If there is an active restriction code preventing entry to Turkey (e.g., G-87 or Ç-114) in the foreigner’s record, the visa request is instantly rejected citing reasons of “public order,” “public security,” or “past visa violation.” This rejection response received is the most concrete indicator that the foreigner is banned in the system.

Can a De Facto Status Check be Made at Border Gates and Airports? What is the Risk?

Some foreigners prefer to find out whether there is a ban against them by coming directly to border gates or airports and trying to enter the country. Passport control officers at border gates can see the foreigner’s status in seconds by making instant inquiries through advanced integrated systems. However, this method is a quite dangerous approach harboring serious legal and physical risks.

Especially the arrival at a border gate of persons who do not merely have an administrative entry ban but an arrest warrant, a judicial fine requiring execution, an international Interpol bulletin (e.g., N-99 code), or a terror/security suspicion (e.g., G-87 code) may lead directly to the taking of an administrative detention decision and the person being handcuffed and transferred to a Removal Center (GGM). If the person’s situation merely consists of a simple entry ban violation, they are taken into “Inadmissible Passenger” (INAD) status in accordance with Article 7 of the LFIP No. 6458. Passengers in this status are kept in special INAD lounges at airports for a maximum of four hours (or until a return flight is arranged) and are returned to the country they came from without being allowed to enter the country.

How to Inquire via Digital Communication Channels (e-Government, UYAP, CİMER, and YİMER 157)?

With the increase in technological integrations, digital platforms where foreigners can learn about administrative decisions concerning them have also developed. However, the accessibility of these platforms varies according to the foreigner’s status:

e-Government (e-Devlet) and Foreign Identity Number (YKN): Persons who have obtained a Foreign Identity Number (YKN) by getting a residence permit in Turkey can query the “Entry/Exit Document” to the country through the e-Government platform thanks to the integration with the General Directorate of Security, and examine their past travel data and passport movements. While overseas exit bans imposed by judicial authorities can be queried via e-Government or the UYAP Citizen Portal; restriction codes established by the Migration Management are not explicitly listed. Warnings appearing as “service unavailable” in visa applications or system logins may indicate the presence of a restriction code.
File Tracking via UYAP: If there is an ongoing lawsuit in the Administrative Courts requesting the annulment of a deportation or entry ban against the foreigner, or in the Criminal Judgeships of Peace for an objection to administrative detention, the documents and hearing minutes of these files can be accessed via the UYAP system with an e-Government password.
CİMER Applications: Within the scope of the Right to Information Act No. 4982, foreign nationals residing in Turkey or holding rights in accordance with the principle of reciprocity can request information from competent institutions via the Presidency Communication Center (CİMER). By verifying contact information with a T.R. Identity Number or Foreign Identity Number in CİMER applications, an information request can be forwarded directly to the relevant institution.
YİMER 157 Call Center: The Foreigners Communication Center (YİMER 157), operating within the Presidency of Migration Management, provides uninterrupted and multilingual service 24/7. Foreigners can call this line to get information and guidance support regarding YKN inquiries, residence processes, and the general status of the restrictions against them.

What is the Legal Framework of the Entry Ban? What Do LFIP Article 9 and Deportation Decisions Cover?

The most fundamental legal basis of the entry ban to Turkey is Article 9 of the Law on Foreigners and International Protection (LFIP) No. 6458. The relevant article grants wide administrative discretionary power to the Presidency of Migration Management and governorships to ban the entry of foreigners deemed objectionable in terms of public order, public security, or public health. Pursuant to the second paragraph of the same article, the entry of foreigners who have been deported from Turkey is directly banned.

Under What Circumstances is a Deportation Decision Taken? (LFIP Article 54)

A deportation decision is the process of physically removing a foreigner from the territory of Turkey; whereas an entry ban is the mechanism that prevents this person from returning to the country after being removed. Article 54 of the LFIP has determined the foreigners against whom a deportation decision will be taken with the numerus clausus (limited number) principle. It is unlawful to establish a deportation process on an administrative ground other than the cases listed in this article. The main reasons for deportation are:

Being a manager, member, or supporter of a terrorist organization.
Posing a threat to public order, security, or health.
Using false documents in visa or residence permit applications.
Violating the duration of a visa, visa exemption, or residence permit for more than 10 days without excuse.
Being employed unrecorded without a work permit.
Violating the provisions for legal entry to or exit from Turkey.

How Does the Administrative Detention and Removal Centers (GGM) Process Work?

Among the foreigners against whom a deportation decision is taken, those who have a risk of absconding or disappearing, who entered Turkey illegally, who used false documents, or who pose a threat to public order are placed under administrative detention by a governorship decision. These persons are transferred to Removal Centers (GGM) within 48 hours following their apprehension.

Administrative detention, although a severe measure restricting a person’s liberty, is different from prison arrest. Pursuant to national legislation and international standards (e.g., European Union Directive 2008/115), the administrative detention period is a maximum of 6 months. If the foreigner does not cooperate with the administration in deportation proceedings (hiding their passport, concealing their nationality, etc.), this period can be extended by a maximum of 6 more months, reaching a total of 1 year. The necessity of administrative detention is regularly evaluated by the governorship every month. Objections against administrative detention decisions deemed unlawful should be made immediately to the Criminal Judgeships of Peace, not to Administrative Courts. The criminal judge of peace is obliged to render a definitive decision on this objection within 5 days.

Who Cannot Be Deported? What are the Exceptions under LFIP Article 55?

Even if there is a deportation decision or entry ban against them within the scope of LFIP Article 54, the removal of some foreigners from the country is strictly forbidden in accordance with universal human rights norms (especially the principle of non-refoulement). Pursuant to LFIP Article 55;

Those about whom there are serious indications that they will be subjected to the death penalty, torture, inhuman or degrading treatment in the country to which they will be deported,
Those whose travel poses a vital risk due to pregnancy, old age, or serious health problems,
Victims of human trafficking who are benefiting from the victim support process,
Victims of psychological, physical, or sexual violence, until their treatments are completed,
Those whose life-threatening diseases cannot be treated in their home country, cannot be subject to a deportation decision. Humanitarian residence permits may be granted to foreigners in this situation by the administration.

What is the Invitation to Leave Turkey (LFIP Article 56) and the Ç-137 Code?

Not every foreigner against whom a deportation decision is taken is immediately placed under administrative detention. Foreigners who do not have a suspicion of absconding or a serious security risk are granted a period of 15 to 30 days to leave Turkey by their own means within the scope of LFIP Article 56. This invitation is an opportunity offered for the person to correct their legal status with their own consent, and an “Exit Permit Document” is given to the person.

If the foreigner goes to the border gate within this granted period and exits legally, and pays any accumulated administrative fines, an entry ban decision may not be taken against them at the discretion of the Migration Management. However, foreigners who do not comply with the 15 to 30-day period given by the administration and continue to stay in the country are deemed to have lost their goodwill. In this case, the “Ç-137 (Foreigners Invited to Leave)” restriction code is processed into the foreigner’s record. This rule violation causes the foreigner’s entry into Turkey to be automatically banned for 5 years and, when apprehended, to be forcibly deported by being taken into administrative detention.

What are the Entry Bans and Administrative Fines Based on Violation Periods?

The sanctions to be applied in case of exceeding (staying illegally) the durations of a visa, visa exemption, or residence permit vary depending on the duration of the violation and the foreigner’s behavior (whether they left voluntarily or were caught by law enforcement). These periods have been shaped in line with Article 9 of Law No. 6458 and the jurisprudence determined by the Migration Management.

How is the Entry Ban Chart Applied According to Violation Periods?

In the table below, the entry ban sanctions applied depending on illegal stay periods are presented in a structured format:

Unauthorized (Illegal) Stay Period in Turkey	Sanction for Those Who Voluntarily Come to the Border and Pay Their Fine	Sanction for Those Caught Upon Detection of Violation or Who Do Not Pay Their Fine	Applied Administrative Restriction Code
Up to 0 – 3 Months	If the administrative fine is paid, an entry ban decision may not be given (Exemption initiative).	An entry ban between 3 Months and 5 Years is applied depending on the situation.	Ç-101
Between 3 Months – 6 Months	A 1-Month Entry Ban is established.	An entry ban between 3 Months and 1 Year is established.	Ç-102 or Ç-167
Between 6 Months – 1 Year	A 3-Month Entry Ban is established.	A 1-Year Entry Ban is established.	Ç-103
Between 1 Year – 2 Years	A 1-Year Entry Ban is established.	A 2-Year Entry Ban is established.	Ç-104
Between 2 Years – 3 Years	A 2-Year Entry Ban is established.	A 5-Year Entry Ban is established.	Ç-105
Violation for More Than 3 Years	A 5-Year Entry Ban is established.	A 5-Year Entry Ban is established.	Ç-105

Important Legal Rule: Pursuant to LFIP Article 9/3, the standard maximum duration of an entry ban to Turkey is 5 years. However, if it is reported by intelligence or security units that the person poses a serious threat in terms of public order or public security, the Presidency of Migration Management has the authority to extend this period by another 10 years, which practically means a 15-year ban.

What are the Administrative Fines within the Scope of Law No. 6458 Article 102?

Situations such as visa violations, illegal entry into the country, absconding from administrative detention, or failure of carriers to comply with their obligations do not only result in an entry ban; they are also subjected to an administrative fine sanction pursuant to LFIP Article 102. An administrative sanction decision is not an obstacle to establishing a deportation or entry ban; both can be applied together.

Some examples of administrative fines (approximate) updated with revaluation rates for the year 2026 are as follows:

Type of Violation (LFIP Article 102)	2026 Estimated Fine Amount	Decision Authority
Illegal entry or attempt to leave Turkey (art.102/1-a)	41,241 TL	Law Enforcement / Migration Management
Entering secretly despite being banned from entering Turkey (art.102/1-b)	20,605 TL	Law Enforcement
Not leaving Turkey within the invitation to leave period granted to them (art.102/1-c)	20,605 TL	Law Enforcement
Absconding from administrative detention or a Removal Center (art.102/1-ç)	20,605 TL	Law Enforcement

What Do Restriction Codes Mean and How Are They Classified?

The restriction codes that will appear before the foreigner as a result of the inquiry constitute the heart of the action the administration has established against the foreigner. Which legal step will be taken depends on these combinations of letters and numbers seen in the system. These codes are basically classified as administrative violations (Ç codes), security threats (G codes), preliminary permission conditions (N codes), and forgery/smuggling suspicions (V and K codes).

What are the Restrictions Based on Administrative Violations and Judicial Processes? (Ç Codes)

Ç codes are the most frequently encountered codes and are usually applied as a result of the violation of visa/residence rules or minor judicial/administrative proceedings involving the foreigner.

Codes from Ç-101 to Ç-105: As detailed in the table above, they symbolize entry bans arising purely from visa or residence violations. These codes are periodical; they become passive when their periods expire and fines are paid.
Ç-113 Code: Imposed on foreigners who enter Turkey illegally or exit the country illegally. This code brings a strict 2-year entry ban when processed into the foreigner’s record. However, if the person does not pay the fine imposed due to their illegal crossing or does not cover the GGM expenses, this ban is automatically extended to 5 years.
Ç-114 and Ç-115 Codes: If the foreigner is involved in a crime during their stay in Turkey or a judicial investigation/prosecution is conducted against them, the Ç-114 code is issued. The most prominent feature of this code is that it is not mandatory for the foreigner to have received a penalty as a result of the trial; even an action simply reflected to judicial authorities is considered a reason for a 2-year ban by the administration. If the foreigner has been convicted, served time in prison, and then released, the Ç-115 code is processed into their file. Ç-115 is not applied for those who are acquitted.
Ç-116 Code: Applied for foreigners who endanger general morality and public health (for example, those caught in unrecorded entertainment venues or with prostitution allegations) and brings along a deportation decision.
Ç-136 Code: Indicates that the foreigner did not repay the travel and accommodation expenses incurred by the state during the deportation process. Unless these expenses (the state’s public receivable) are paid, the person cannot enter the country; it is a kind of “conditional” ban.
Ç-138 Code: An administrative code applied to stubborn passengers (for example, causing a disturbance in the transit zone) who arrive at the Turkish border gate and refuse to enter the country without a reasonable excuse. It can often be imposed as a result of personal stubbornness experienced with officers and can be removed via an annulment lawsuit.
Ç-179 Code: Established for those involved in an extremely severe international crime against humanity, such as organ or tissue trafficking. Their entry into the country is strictly banned for 5 years, and administrative authorities are entirely unwilling to remove this code; it can only be objected to in case of exoneration before a court.

Which are the Security and Intelligence-Based Restrictions? (G Codes)

G codes are codes centered on public security, established by the Migration Management in light of the reports it receives from the intelligence departments of the National Intelligence Organization (MİT) and the General Directorate of Security (EGM). It is almost impossible for the administration to remove these codes on its own initiative.

G-26 Code: Imposed on the suspicion that the foreigner is a member of an illegal or terror-linked organization or supports organization activities. Generally evaluated within the scope of TCK Art. 59 or LFIP Art. 54/1-b. It is a reason for definitive deportation and indefinite ban.
G-78 Code: The code imposed for foreigners carrying a contagious disease threatening public health. If it is proven with a current and independent medical board report that the disease is completely cured, it can be removed through administrative objection.
G-87 Code: Issued for persons who pose a serious threat in terms of general security. It is one of the most challenging codes in legal practice; because sometimes an indefinite entry ban can be imposed on a foreigner based solely on abstract intelligence reports without a concrete conviction. For someone with a G-87 code, neither an annotated visa can be obtained nor do consulates accept an administrative application. An annulment lawsuit to be filed in Administrative Courts is essential, and the court conducts a proportionality and reality review by requesting these secret intelligence evidences to review the administration’s decision.

What do International Search and Preliminary Permission Conditions Mean? (N Codes)

Although N codes do not directly contain the word “ban,” they are preliminary permission mechanisms where entry is practically made impossible in application.

N-82 (Pre-Clearance Code): A code that stipulates that foreigners whose entry to Turkey is deemed risky but against whom a direct banning decision is not taken must obtain a special preliminary permission from the Ministry of Interior before entering the country. In practice, these preliminary permission requests are almost always rejected, so the person is turned back from the border gate “because they could not get permission” in the system. It is hardly possible to overcome it without having it annulled by a court decision.
N-99 Code (Interpol): The code that ensures the detection at the entry to Turkey of persons against whom a red notice, diffusion, or international arrest warrant has been issued by Interpol or foreign law enforcement units. When a person with an N-99 code is detected at the border gate, not only are they not allowed to enter; they can also be immediately detained and imprisoned for extradition procedures. If the Interpol bulletin is unjust (for example, political or a mistaken name similarity), legal applications must be made both to Administrative Courts in Turkey and to the Interpol Commission in Lyon, France, for the removal of this code.

Other Administrative Obstacles: In Which Situations Are V and K Codes Applied?

V-70 Code (Fake Marriage): Imposed on foreigners who make a marriage of convenience (fake) with Turkish citizens solely to obtain residence or Turkish citizenship. If the administration concludes that the marriage is fake as a result of divorce records or cross-interviews, it immediately cancels the foreigner’s residence permit and imposes an entry ban against them for 5 years. Because it carries the grounds of forgery of documents and disturbing public order, the administration does not remove this easily; proving that the marriage is real (de facto) is only possible before a court.
K Codes (Smuggling): Applied to foreigners who are processed on suspicion of customs smuggling, human smuggling, or illegal commercial activity. When the foreigner ceases to be a suspect and submits a finalized court decision showing that they were acquitted in the criminal trial, it is deleted from their record by the decision of the Administrative Court.

What Are the Possible Scenarios Awaiting Those with an Entry Ban?

The steps that a foreigner with any restriction or banning decision against them will take in the future can turn into legal disasters as a result of simple mistakes made unknowingly. Especially the delicate balances between penal applications and residence processes must be well known.

What is the V-84 Conditional Entry Application and the “10 Day” Rule?

Some foreigners exit by paying the existing administrative fines (visa violation fine) at the border gate while leaving the country and prevent a new entry ban restriction from being imposed on them. When these people return to Turkey a short time later, if they declare to the border police that they “will obtain a residence permit,” they are admitted to the country by the police making them sign a V-84 conditional entry undertaking.

However, there is a very critical threshold here: The foreigner must apply for a new residence permit (touristic, student, family, etc.) via the e-ikamet system within a maximum of 10 days from the date they enter the country. This 10-day period is never a “penalty exemption” or a relief period; it is a strict option period. If the foreigner does not complete their application within 10 days:

They are deemed to have committed a V-84 violation and fall directly into illegal status.
The moment they are caught, a direct deportation decision is taken within the scope of LFIP Art. 54 and they are sent to the GGM for administrative detention.
Upon their exit, a new periodic or indefinite restriction code is processed against them this time. Therefore, the first job of a person entering the country with a V-84 should be to create their residence file electronically.

How Do the Right to Respect for Family Life and Judicial (AYM / ECHR) Decisions Affect?

A deportation decision and 5-year or indefinite entry bans applied to a foreigner mean that the person is torn away from their Turkish citizen or legally resident spouse, children, and the settled life they have established in Turkey. Right at this point, the administration’s “state’s sovereignty power” and the individual’s “Right to Respect for Private and Family Life” (Constitution Article 20, ECHR Article 8) enter into a serious conflict.

According to the jurisprudence of the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) and the Constitutional Court of the Republic of Turkey (AYM) (for example, the Kenan Kalkan or Selçuk Karakaya decisions), the entry ban established by the administration is not an absolute right; it must absolutely undergo a “proportionality and balance” test.

De Facto Family Ties: The ECHR does not always stipulate an official marriage certificate for the protection of family life. The spouses living together for a long time, having common children, or establishing strong emotional/economic ties (de facto ties) are accepted as sufficient for the existence of family life.
Principle of Proportionality: If the foreigner is deported and subjected to an entry ban for many years just because they exceeded their visa period by a few months or worked in a workshop without obtaining a work permit (that is, while there is no element of violence, terror, or infamous crime), and this situation leads to the victimization of the child or spouse left behind, the courts find the administrative decision disproportionate. While examining the existence of family life, the Constitutional Court takes as a basis the situation at the date when the ban and deportation decision became finalized (at that moment). If there is a regular and inseparable family life, the court can annul the administration’s deportation and banning action.

Which Legal Recourses Should Be Followed to Lift the Entry Ban to Turkey?

In front of a foreigner who has queried and definitively determined the administrative sanctions, entry bans, and restriction codes against them, there are three basic methods determined by the legislator for them to overcome these obstacles. Each of these methods is used for specific situations, codes, and timings.

1. How Does the Administrative Objection (Administrative Application) Path to the Migration Management Work?

Pursuant to LFIP Article 9/6 paragraph, the administration imposing an entry ban or restriction code (Directorate General of Migration Management or Governorship) can completely lift this ban before its period expires or grant the foreigner a special permission to enter Turkey for a specific period even if it keeps the ban decision in the system. This method works mostly for codes where technical and administrative deficiencies are in question.

For example, if the visa violation fine (Ç codes) issued to the foreigner has been paid later and its receipt can be presented,
In the restriction imposed for illness or health reasons (G-78), if full-fledged state hospital reports showing that the person has completely recovered can be submitted,
In easily compensable situations like address notification violations (V-71), the administrative application is quite practical.

Process: A comprehensive and evidence-based objection petition addressed to the Migration Management is prepared. The administration has an obligation to respond to this application within 30 days. If the administration gives no response for 30 days (implicit rejection) or directly gives a negative response, the administrative remedy is deemed exhausted and the legal judicial process is initiated. In G and N codes based on crime and security, the administrative application is generally seen as a waste of time; because the administration does not easily annul its own intelligence decision.

2. Annulment Lawsuit in the Administrative Court and Stay of Execution Process

In cases where the entry ban is an arbitrary action of the administration, lacks a legal basis, or is against the principle of proportionality (for example, disrupting family unity), the sole and most definitive path to take is to file an annulment lawsuit in the Administrative Courts. This judicial review mechanism opens all the administration’s documents (including intelligence reports) to debate before the court.

Deadlines Are Very Critical:

Annulment of Mere Entry Ban and Restriction: Pursuant to the Administrative Jurisdiction Procedures Law (İYUK), the deadline for filing an annulment lawsuit against the mere restriction action of the administration (without a deportation decision) is 60 days from notification or learning.
Lawsuit Against Deportation Decision: LFIP Article 53/3 has brought a very clear special law rule. If the entry ban was taken simultaneously with a deportation decision, the time limit to apply to the administrative court against this deportation decision is only 7 days from the notification of the decision. This seven-day period is a forfeiture of right period. Filing the lawsuit within these 7 days automatically stops the deportation procedures by law until the court concludes (LFIP Art. 53/3). In this way, the foreigner is taken under a protection shield until the trial is over. However, this automatic stay is only for the deportation process.
Stay of Execution (YD): There is no “automatic protection” for a person who is abroad and only sues the entry ban. In order for the foreigner to return to their spouse or job in Turkey while their lawsuit is ongoing (which administrative lawsuits can take between 8 to 12 months), an urgent Stay of Execution is requested from the court in the lawsuit petition. If the court finds this request justified and gives a YD decision, the effect of the entry ban is suspended until the end of the lawsuit and the person can enter the country.
ECHR Rule 39 (Interim Measure): When domestic remedies are about to be exhausted or when the Administrative Court issues a rejection decision, if there is a clear and imminent risk of torture or death in the country to which the person will be sent, an urgent measure application can be made directly to the European Court of Human Rights (ECHR) within the scope of Rules of Court Article 39 (Rule 39). This suspension decision given by the ECHR is absolutely binding for Turkey.

3. How to Overcome the Ban with a Special Annotated Visa (Explanatory / Conditional Permission)?

In cases where the judicial process will take a long time, the most functional “shortcut” provided by law for banned foreigners who urgently need to come to Turkey is the Annotated Visa (Special Explanatory Visa) application. An annotated visa is the granting of a one-time or specific period entry permit to a foreigner with an entry ban to fulfill a special and valid purpose.

For What Purposes Is It Given?: It can be given for specific and humanitarian purposes such as family reunification, a work permit obtained from a Turkish company, university acceptance (education), commercial activities, urgent medical treatment, attendance at judicial hearings, or a funeral. It is essential that the validity period of the foreigner’s passport is at least 8 months and the required documents are presented completely.
Legal Result: A very common misconception is that the annotated visa erases the ban. Obtaining an annotated visa does not erase or remove the entry ban or restriction code. It merely opens a legal door for the person to fulfill that purpose (for example, returning to their spouse) despite the existing ban. After the foreigner enters the country with this visa, they can continue their life by obtaining a new residence or work permit suitable for their purpose; thus, the entry ban practically becomes ineffective (meaningless).

Conclusion:

Within the modern state structure, the entry of foreigners to the country and their stay in the country are subject to a strict administrative regime whose borders are determined by thick lines and tied to serious sanctions. Errors made by a foreigner facing an entry ban; such as objecting to the wrong court without considering the violation periods, missing the 7-day and 60-day forfeiture periods, or not complying with the 10-day V-84 conditional entry period, can cause them to stay away from Turkey and their loved ones for many years. In this context, operating legal solutions such as administrative application mechanisms, annulment lawsuits, and annotated visas at the right time and in an integrated manner is the only valid method to eliminate victimizations.